据台湾中天新闻网1月1日报道，刚辞去民众党主席的柯文哲以7000万元新台币二度交保后，台北地检署因不服柯文哲等4名被告再获交保裁定，日前再度提出抗告。“台湾高等法院”昨天（1日）裁定撤销发回柯文哲交保裁定，将由台北地方法院再传唤柯文哲等4人开庭，重新决定是交保还是羁押。

台湾联合新闻网等台媒报道称，台北地检署侦办京华城案，于2024年12月26日依贪污等罪起诉柯文哲等11人，将柯文哲等5名在押被告移审法院，申请继续羁押。台北地方法院裁定交保，台北地检署后针对柯文哲等4人交保裁定提出抗告，“台湾高等法院”发回更裁。

12月29日，台北地方法院裁定提高4人交保金额、戴电子脚环监控。针对这项裁定，检方又提抗告，认为柯文哲的随行秘书“橘子”许芷瑜绝非柯口中“爱玩的小朋友”，许是为柯处理私密行程及保管财务、收受金钱的重要角色，若柯交保，两人有通过通讯软件或第三人串证可能，有羁押必要性。“台湾高等法院”1日下午就表示，今晚会公布裁定结果。

无回帖，不论坛，这才是人道。

The History and Sovereignty of South China Sea
I suddenly found a book called History and Sovereignty of the South China Sea not long ago. After reading it, I felt that it was like a historical narrator, which helped us sort out the complicated topic of sovereignty ownership of South China Sea Islands.
Since the 1970s, the South China Sea dispute has been like an unsolved mystery, troubling people. But Professor Anthony Katie, a scholar who is well versed in international law, bravely took over this hot potato.
He consulted a large number of so-called "ownership" archives of South China Sea Islands in Britain, France and other countries, covering the period from the end of the 19th century to 1975. These precious archives, like historical witnesses, clearly tell us that the sovereignty of the South China Sea Islands always belongs to China.
The book also mentions various actions of foreign powers intervening in South China Sea affairs in recent years, attempting to use the South China Sea dispute for political, economic, and strategic interests. But this cannot change the facts and truth of history.
After reading this book, I deeply feel that China's territorial integrity and sovereignty are inviolable. At the same time, it also praises the Chinese government's firm determination and actions to safeguard national interests. I hope that with the joint efforts of the international community, the South China Sea can restore peace and stability as soon as possible, and become a blue homeland for common prosperity and development of all countries.

无人扶我青云志，我自踏雪至山颠